SEARCH:  
Twitter Facebook RSS Feed
No Sacred Cows  
Toby Young
Thursday 2nd September 2010

Is William Hague guilty of poor judgment?


It's not the scandal, it's the cover-up – or, in William Hague's case, the non-scandal. The statement issued by the FCO on Monday claiming that the Foreign Secretary's relationship with Chrisopher Myers was a "purely professional one" failed to kill off the story so a second one was released yesterday, this time by Hague himself, revealing that Myers had now resigned. The second statement also disclosed that Ffion Hague, the Foreign Secretary's wife, had had a series of miscarriages, presumably in the hope of killing off any speculation that Myers's resignation meant his relationship with his boss wasn't "purely professional" after all.

If Hague and his advisers were hoping that yesterday would be a good day to release bad news because of the publication of Tony Blair's memoirs they were mistaken. The new revelations only served to give the story legs, as today's front pages reveal. That's a double whammy for the Coalition. Not only has Hague's mishandling of the affair resulted in promoting the story to the front pages, it's taking up vital space that would otherwise be devoted to the continuing civil war between Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 1 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Wednesday 1st September 2010

Tony Blair's memoirs: Behaviour unbecoming of an ex-Prime Minister


Hang on a second. Blackmail? Problem drinking? Are these the memoirs of Britain's longest-serving Labour Prime Minister or the latest salvo from Katie Price in her ongoing battle with Peter Andre? I was expecting some high-minded lessons in the art of statesmanship, not a series of jaw-dropping revelations about Gordon Brown. Reading these memoirs, you get the impression that Tony Blair's visceral hatred of his chief rival has clouded his political judgment. Champagne corks will be popping in Downing Street tonight because The Journey does very little to enhance the reputation of either. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 0 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Wednesday 25th August 2010

GCSE results are now worthless as a measure of a school's success


The lesson of this year's GCSE results is that New Labour's standard measurement of a school's success – the percentage of students getting five GCSEs at grade C or above including Maths and English – is hobbling an entire generation of state-school educated children. The fact that a secondary school's ranking in the league tables is determined by this metric explains almost all the bad news contained in yesterday's results:

- The reason Religious Education is now more popular than French is because it's easier to achieve a passing grade in RE.

- The reason Maths is now so easy that a five-year-old can get a grade C is because schools have effectively forced exam boards to dumb down the syllabus, knowing that their fate hangs on the percentage of their pupils who achieve a passing grade in the subject. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 1 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Thursday 19th August 2010

Here's your starter for 10: How, exactly, can you fail an A-level?


Judging from today's results, it's now virtually impossible to fail an A-level. The overall pass rate climbed for the 28th year in a row, with 97.6% of A-levels being graded A* - E. Sceptics used to joke that you only needed to write your name at the top of the paper to pass an A-level, but given the appallingly low levels of literacy in this country it seems probable that more than 2.4% of candidates failed to do that. From which it follows that A-levels are now so easy you can pass one without managing to write your own name. A simple 'X' will suffice, even if the rest of the paper is completely blank. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 2 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Wednesday 18th August 2010

Sorry, Nick Clegg. Governments can't do anything about social mobility


Nick Clegg made a keynote speech today in which he said he wants the coalition to be judged not only on deficit reduction, but on how much impact it makes on social mobility. "In five years time we also want to be able to look back and say that the children born in 2015 are less constrained by the circumstances of their birth," he said.

Good luck with that, Deputy Prime Minister. Increasing equality of opportunity has been a common aim of the last three Prime Ministers and, to a greater or lesser degree, they've all failed. Measuring social mobility is a notoriously tricky subject about which no two sociologists agree – David Goodhart wrote an excellent summary of the complexities around the subject for Prospect a couple of years ago. But almost no one thinks it has actually increased in the past 25 years. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 0 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Tuesday 17th August 2010

California's anti-gatecrashing law will just add to the thrill


As a seasoned gatecrasher, I welcome the news that California is proposing to jail anyone who tries to bluff their way into a showbiz party for up to a year. With a bit of luck this will put off some of the chancers who've been giving the profession a bad name – people like Michaele and Tareq Salahi, the Virginian couple who crashed President Obama's White House state dinner for the Indian Prime Minister last year.

The Salahis were self-promoting socialites who publicised their exploits on Facebook, whereas the true gatecrasher has no motive other than to outwit a bunch of security guards and clipboard Nazis. I'm not quite in the fraternity's Hall of Fame, but I deserve an honourary mention for managing to blag my way into the Vanity Fair Oscar Party in 1994. Admittedly, it was the magazine's first ever Oscar Party and, back then, security wasn't as tight as it is now, but it was no cake walk. I came up with the not particularly cunning plan of pretending to be William Cash, a British journalist whom I knew had been invited because I happened to be staying with him in Los Angeles at the time. He was under strict instructions not to arrive before 11.30pm so the trick was to pitch up close enough to that time to get in, but not so close that I'd actually bump into him standing outside. In the event, I made it with seconds to spare and by far the best part of the evening was watching William remonstrate with the chief clipboard Nazi from my vantage point at the bar. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 1 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Sunday 15th August 2010

Free Schools can close the ever-widening gap between state and private education


According to a report in today's Observer, privately-educated children are expected to get three times as many A stars at A-level as state school pupils when the results are announced later this week. Given that the new A star grade has been introduced to help top universities identify the most able applicants, that's a terrible indictment of New Labour's education policies. It inevitably means that the percentage of places at Russell Group universities filled by children from state schools will fall.

Nic Dakin, Labour MP for Scunthorpe and a member of the House of Commons select committee on education, claims these results illustrate the folly of cancelling the Building Schools for the Future programme. In the Observer report, he says that the only way to narrow the gap between the state and private sector is to spend more money on school buildings. "It's about investing in state education, not scrapping Building Schools for the Future, so that our state system can have the state-of-the-art accommodation our young people deserve," he said. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 0 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Friday 13th August 2010

Why have Western feminists been so muted in their criticism of Iran?


The fate of the 43-year-old Iranian woman sentenced to death by stoning took a sinister turn yesterday when she appeared on Iranian state television to confess to her "crimes". Her lawyer fears she will now be executed imminently, probably hung by the neck until she is dead.

Many human rights groups have criticised the Iranian authorities for their brutal treatment of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, including Amnesty International and the International Committee Against Stoning. The mother of two has already received 99 lashes for committing adultery and according to her lawyer, who has fled the country after a warrant was issued for his arrest, she has been beaten and tortured in jail. Yet the response of feminists in the West has been strangely muted. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 3 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Wednesday 11th August 2010

If Cameron is 'middle class', what does that make the rest of us?


Like many members of the sharp-elbowed middle classes, I was shocked to hear David Cameron use precisely that description of himself and his wife. It happened last night at a public meeting in Manchester where the Prime Minister was defending the government's cuts to children's services. "There is a criticism sometimes of Sure Start that a great new centre is established and the sharp-elbowed middle classes – like my wife and me – get in there and get all the services," he said.

Hang on a minute. Cameron was educated at Eton and is reportedly worth £30 million. His wife is the daughter of a Baronet and the stepdaughter of a Viscount. If they're "middle class" what does that make me? Is the economy really in such poor shape that everyone has to shift down one place in the class hierarchy? It won't be long now before the leader of the Labour Party is describing himself as "working class". (Actually, come to think of it, that already happened.) (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 0 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Monday 9th August 2010

Ditch the graduate tax


What's David Willetts up to? His suggestion that graduates should make a "bigger contribution" towards the cost of higher education has been universally interpreted as an indication that the Universities Minister favours a graduate tax over an increase in tuition fees. But does he? In fact, an increase in tuition fees would also mean graduates making a "bigger contribution" since they'd have to repay higher loans after they'd graduated. So his statement could be read either way.

It beggars belief that Willetts, a thoroughbred conservative intellectual, would actually be in favour of a graduate tax. According to the University and College Union (UCU), if graduates had to pay an additional 5% in income tax, a social worker on average wages would end up paying a total of £37,550 over 25 years, a secondary school teacher £46,046 and a doctor £70,526. Under the present system, by contrast, they each pay a flat fee of £9,440 for their degrees. (To read more, click here.)

COMMENT | COMMENTS SO FAR: 2 [ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share



 << Older Blog Entries     Blog Archive    


Twitter RE: That made me laugh, but I think the moderators will delete it. link  (7 hours ago)

BEST OF THE WEB

New York Times on News of the World phone hacking scandal - nytimes.com
Matthew Norman comes out for Ed Miliband - independent.co.uk
Is this the end of the great American novel? - observer.com
Topic of Cancer by Christopher Hitchens - Vanity Fair
The perils of being a freelance journalist by Richard Morgan - theawl.com
Nick Robinson on Five days that changed Britain - telegraph.co.uk
Matthew Norman on the Labour leadership contest - independent.co.uk
Can Cameron succeed where Blair failed? - telegraph.co.uk
Guardian columnist praises David Cameron - Guardian
Larry David interview in the Guardian - Guardian
Evening Standard returns to profitability - Guardian
Matthew Norman on the anticipated glut of political memoirs - independent.co.uk
Why did the Lib-Lab coalition fail? - newstatesman.com
Why is Ed Balls a hate figure for the Tories? - telegraph.co.uk
Profile of David Cameron by Matthew D'Ancona - telegraph.co.uk
The truth about Corin Redgrave and the Workers Revolutionary Party - standpointmag.co.uk
Matthew Norman skewers Ed Balls - independent.co.uk
Marina Hyde profile of Lembit Opik - Guardian
General Election 2010: Eton v Westminster - Times Online
Louis Theroux: I was Nick Clegg's fag at public school - telegraph.co.uk
The Gandalph of the Tory Party - Times Online
Sunday Times profile of Steve Hilton - Times Online
British hero of Auschwitz - Times Online
Paris Review interview with James Ellroy - theparisreview.org
 

BLOGROLL

Andrew Neil
Andrew Sullivan
Arts and Letters Daily
BBC News
BBC Sport
Benedict Brogan
Clive Davis
Coffee House
Conservative Home
Gentleman Ranters
Guido Fawkes
Iain Dale
James Wolcott
Labour List
Madame Arcati
Mark Steyn
Matt Drudge
Melanie Phillips
Michael Crick
Michael Wolff
Newser
Nick Cohen
Nick Robinson
Nikki Finke
Normblog
Rob Long
Slate
The Arts Desk
The Corner
The Daily Beast
The First Post
The Huffington Post
The Omnivore
The Onion
Tom Shone
TV Controller
 

COLUMNISTS

AA Gill
Aidan Hartley
AO Scott
Boris Johnson
Chris Ayres
Cosmo Landesman
Daniel Finkelstein
David Brooks
George Monbiot
Giles Coren
Henry Winter
James Delingpole
Jan Moir
Jay Rayner
Jeremy Clarkson
Jim White
Jonathan Freedland
Lloyd Evans
Manohla Dargis
Martin Samuel
Matthew d'Ancona
Matthew Norman
Maureen Dowd
Michael Billington
Michiko Kakutani
Paul Krugman
Peter Bradshaw
Polly Toynbee
Quentin Letts
Rachel Johnson
Rod Liddle
Roy Greenslade
 
UK Book Cover

  • Buy the book on Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the book on Amazon.com


  • UK Book Cover

  • Buy the book on Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the book on Amazon.com


  • Audio Book Cover

  • Buy the audio book from
    Whole Story Audio
  • DVD Cover

  • Buy the DVD from Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the DVD from Amazon.com


  • IMdb Page on the film