SEARCH:  
Twitter Facebook RSS Feed
No Sacred Cows  
Toby Young
Monday 1st February 2010

Smile or Die: How Positive Thinking Fooled America and the World by Barbara Ehrenreich


When the left-wing American essayist Barbara Ehrenreich was diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000 she became a little depressed. After all, 40,000 American women die every year from breast cancer and the chemotherapy with which it’s typically treated involves numerous unpleasant side effects, including baldness, nausea, mouth sores, immunosuppression, anemia and -- most terrifying of all for a public intellectual with a PhD in cellular biology -- “chemo brain”. Under the circumstances, feeling a bit glum seems perfectly rational.

However, she quickly discovered that this reaction was verboten. When she posts a statement on a breast cancer message board under the subject line “Angry”, listing her complaints, the reaction is overwhelmingly negative. “You need to run, not walk, to some counselling,” advises one fellow-sufferer. Apparently, breast cancer patients are supposed to be cheerful and optimistic, viewing the disease as a blessing rather than a curse.

“In the most extreme characterization, breast cancer is not a problem at all, not even an annoyance -- it is a ‘gift’, deserving of the most heartfelt gratitude,” she writes.

Thankfully, Ehrenreich’s cancer has gone into remission, but the rage she felt on first encountering America’s positive thinking movement hasn’t dissipated. Smile or Die is a 200-page jeremiad against this upbeat philosophy, describing it as a “mass delusion”, a form of “self-hypnosis” and a “tool of social control”. In her analysis, positive thinking is not only a constant irritant in popular culture, it was responsible for the financial crisis of 2007: “What was the point in agonizing over balance sheets and tedious analyses of risks -- and why bother worrying about dizzying levels of debt and exposure to potential defaults -- when all good things come to those who are optimistic enough to expect them?”

That may be overstating things a bit, but Smile or Die is a hugely enjoyable rant in which Ehrenreich hits the bulls eye more often than not. As a trained research scientist, she’s at her best when debunking the dubious factual claims made by the exponents of positive thinking. For instance, she makes short work of the snake oil salesmen who claim that maintaining a positive mental attitude improves your chances of surviving cancer. After reviewing all the most up-to-date research, she concludes that psychotherapy or being in a support group has no medically beneficial effects at all.

Ehrenreich is so thorough in her demolition of nearly all the claims made by the exponents of positive thinking that, at times, it feels as if she’s using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. She is particularly annoyed by a book called The Secret which maintains that you can make a beautiful sexual partner materialise by your side or win the lottery simply by screwing up your eyes and concentrating. She goes to some lengths to refute such “magical thinking”, explaining in scientific detail why it is that thoughts alone cannot exercise a gravitational pull on physical objects. But is that really necessary? Books like The Secret are so obviously utter poppycock it seems foolish to devote such energy to debunking them.

More worthwhile is the chapter on “positive psychology”, an upmarket version of the same gobbledegook that has become so respectable it forms the basis of the “happiness” courses currently taught in several of Britain’s top public schools. The highpoint of the book is her encounter with Martin Seligman, the ex-President of the American Psychological Association and the father of this movement. In spite of Seligman’s intellectual pedigree, his claims can no more withstand the laser beam of her scientific scrutiny than those of Tony Robbins or Deepak Chopra.

Throughout Smile or Die, Ehrenreich presents herself as the voice of common sense and the reader is nearly always on her side, not least because she writes with such unforced authority. It is only when she tries to ally her scepticism with a critique of modern capitalism -- discovering in positive thinking a sinister plot to prevent the poor and downtrodden from protesting about their economic plight -- that her argument becomes a little thin.

Like many left-wing intellectuals, Ehrenreich thinks that the forces conspiring to preserve the capitalist economies of the West are being co-ordinated behind the scenes by a cabal of well-paid evil geniuses. How else to explain why the “historically inevitable” socialist society has failed to materialise? In fact, this belief is every bit as imaginary as the notion that buying a pink teddy bear will improve your chances of surviving breast cancer.

Nevertheless, if you can ignore the left-wing politics, Smile or Die is a wonderfully informative and entertaining book. Anyone who’s ever been taken in by a self-help guru or a motivational speaker should be locked in a room and forced to read it.

[ FIXED LINK | EMAIL TO A FRIEND ] Bookmark and Share





Twitter @itsmotherswork Actually English Free Schools are closer to US Charter Schools than Swedish Free Schools  (6 hours ago)

BEST OF THE WEB

Coalition is heading for troubled waters - telegraph.co.uk
New York Times on News of the World phone hacking scandal - nytimes.com
Matthew Norman comes out for Ed Miliband - independent.co.uk
Is this the end of the great American novel? - observer.com
Topic of Cancer by Christopher Hitchens - Vanity Fair
The perils of being a freelance journalist by Richard Morgan - theawl.com
Nick Robinson on Five days that changed Britain - telegraph.co.uk
Matthew Norman on the Labour leadership contest - independent.co.uk
Can Cameron succeed where Blair failed? - telegraph.co.uk
Guardian columnist praises David Cameron - Guardian
Larry David interview in the Guardian - Guardian
Evening Standard returns to profitability - Guardian
Matthew Norman on the anticipated glut of political memoirs - independent.co.uk
Why did the Lib-Lab coalition fail? - newstatesman.com
Why is Ed Balls a hate figure for the Tories? - telegraph.co.uk
Profile of David Cameron by Matthew D'Ancona - telegraph.co.uk
The truth about Corin Redgrave and the Workers Revolutionary Party - standpointmag.co.uk
Matthew Norman skewers Ed Balls - independent.co.uk
Marina Hyde profile of Lembit Opik - Guardian
General Election 2010: Eton v Westminster - Times Online
Louis Theroux: I was Nick Clegg's fag at public school - telegraph.co.uk
The Gandalph of the Tory Party - Times Online
Sunday Times profile of Steve Hilton - Times Online
British hero of Auschwitz - Times Online
Paris Review interview with James Ellroy - theparisreview.org
 

BLOGROLL

Andrew Neil
Andrew Sullivan
Arts and Letters Daily
BBC News
BBC Sport
Benedict Brogan
Clive Davis
Coffee House
Conservative Home
Gentleman Ranters
Guido Fawkes
Iain Dale
James Wolcott
Labour List
Madame Arcati
Mark Steyn
Matt Drudge
Melanie Phillips
Michael Crick
Michael Wolff
Newser
Nick Cohen
Nick Robinson
Nikki Finke
Normblog
Rob Long
Slate
The Arts Desk
The Corner
The Daily Beast
The First Post
The Huffington Post
The Omnivore
The Onion
Tom Shone
TV Controller
 

COLUMNISTS

AA Gill
Aidan Hartley
AO Scott
Boris Johnson
Chris Ayres
Cosmo Landesman
Daniel Finkelstein
David Brooks
George Monbiot
Giles Coren
Henry Winter
James Delingpole
Jan Moir
Jay Rayner
Jeremy Clarkson
Jim White
Jonathan Freedland
Lloyd Evans
Manohla Dargis
Martin Samuel
Matthew d'Ancona
Matthew Norman
Maureen Dowd
Michael Billington
Michiko Kakutani
Paul Krugman
Peter Bradshaw
Polly Toynbee
Quentin Letts
Rachel Johnson
Rod Liddle
Roy Greenslade
 
UK Book Cover

  • Buy the book on Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the book on Amazon.com


  • UK Book Cover

  • Buy the book on Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the book on Amazon.com


  • Audio Book Cover

  • Buy the audio book from
    Whole Story Audio
  • DVD Cover

  • Buy the DVD from Amazon.co.uk

  • Buy the DVD from Amazon.com


  • IMdb Page on the film